One summer, a few years ago, I was standing in the dining room at Elijah’s Promise right before we opened to serve lunch. There was a group of teens gathered by the serving counter readying for the doors to open. Two were Mormon missionaries, two Muslim youth from the Central Jersey Islamic Society, two Jewish teens serving with the Mitzvah Corps and a couple of kids from a Presbyterian church doing time to fulfill a confirmation requirement. The youth were deep in conversation about their respective religious traditions. They were asking questions of one another, sharing perspectives…it was a lively discussion and occasionally heated. But when the doors opened and the patrons filed in for lunch, the discussion shifted to the focus of their day…making sure the hungry were fed. It was for me then and remains for me still, an important image. People, from diverse backgrounds, united in purpose and joined together in service.
Today, across our country, people are gathering, many to volunteer their time in community service, in honor of the life and memory of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Right now, people are painting walls, serving meals and reading to kids. They are planting gardens and building homes for homeless families. They are collecting clothes and cans, and books and furniture to distribute to people who are less fortunate.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., in a message delivered atEbenezerBaptistChurchinAtlantaon Feb. 4, 1968 said “Everybody can be great, because everybody can serve. You don’t have to have a college degree to serve. You don’t have to make your subject and your verb agree to serve. You don’t have to know about Plato and Aristotle to serve. You don’t have to know Einstein’s theory of relativity to serve. You don’t have to know the second theory of thermodynamics in physics to serve. You only need a heart full of grace, a soul generated by love.”
Service is indeed a great thing. Service and the people who commit to helping others are the life blood of organizations like Elijah’s Promise and a potent force in many communities across this country. I’m not sure exactly how the Martin Luther King holiday came to be a sort of national day of service. And frankly, I can’t help to think that Dr. King himself might be disappointed. For service, while admirable, is only one step in the movement of pervasive social, political and economic change that marked the life and death of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
King advocated for civil rights, for diversity, and for an end to discrimination. At the time of his death, his focus was not just on race; he was speaking in support of labor unions and their right to strike and organize for better working conditions and benefits; he was marching and advocating for policies that would eradicate poverty…he was working to turn the traditional social and economic order on its head…his vision, his actions, his message was one that confronted the dominant power structure…he wouldn’t just occupy Wall Street, he’d march and sit and boycott Wall St., and Pennsylvania Ave. and Main Sts. Across this country. In short, King was about change, transformation…he was about more than service, he was about solutions. He was about more than the charitable acts of collecting cans, and serving meals and painting the walls of shelters…he was about justice…ending hunger, ending homelessness, ending poverty.
A few years ago, the Home News and Tribune ran a story on children living in poverty. They focused their piece on the plight of a local family who frequented the soup kitchen. The mother and her five children were living in a sub-standard two bedroom apartment in town with no furniture. She was on and off of welfare and in and out of work because of the chronic health problems of one of her children and a husband with a substance abuse problem who didn’t maintain child support payments. She never finished HS, and her skills and experience were limited to warehouse work, UPS and the like. Her story is the story of many across this country who live in poverty.
After the story ran, we were flooded with calls at the kitchen…over 100 calls came in the next two days from people who wanted to help the family. From clothing and food donations, to furniture, the outpouring of charity was overwhelming.
While I was struck by the generosity and outpouring of assistance by so many good people, I was also struck by what was not offered…not one call came in that offered a job or training to help her acquire a skill. Not one call came in offering childcare assistance so that she would have back up when her children were sick, so she wouldn’t have to miss work. The charity was plentiful, but none of the help contributed to long term support and change for this family.
Malcolm Gladwell, in a New Yorker magazine article a few years ago writes about a homeless man fromRenonamedMurray. Murraywas an ex-marine who had lived on the streets ofRenofor ten years. He was an alcoholic. InReno, a homeless guy could walk through the casinos and finish off the half-empty glasses of liquor left at the gaming tables. AndMurraydid just that. As a result, he was in and out of jail, in and out of the hospital, in and out of treatment and in and out of shelters.
In 2003, the Reno Police Department started an initiative designed to limit panhandling downtown. They came under harsh criticism by the newspapers, radio and news media. The public outcry was to leave the homeless alone. They weren’t bothering anybody after-all. Two local police officers, Steve Johns and Patrick O’Bryan, found themselves in a quandary. In downtownReno, food for the homeless was plentiful: there was a Gospel kitchen and Catholic Services, and even the local McDonald’s fed the hungry. And yet, the officers spent at least half their time dealing with people likeMurray; they were as much caseworkers as police officers. And they knew they weren’t the only ones involved. When someone passed out on the street, there was a “One down” call to the paramedics. There were four people in an ambulance, and the patient sometimes stayed at the hospital for days, because living on the streets in a state of almost constant intoxication was a reliable way of getting sick. None of that, surely, could be cheap.
O’Bryan and Johns called someone they knew at an ambulance service and then contacted the local hospitals. “We came up with three names that were some of our chronic inebriates in the downtown area, that got arrested the most often,” O’Bryan said. “We tracked those three individuals through just one of our two hospitals. One of the guys had been in jail previously, so he’d only been on the streets for six months. In those six months, he had accumulated a bill of a hundred thousand dollars—Another individual came fromPortlandand had been inRenofor three months. In those three months, he had accumulated a bill for sixty-five thousand dollars. The third individual actually had some periods of being sober, and had accumulated a bill of fifty thousand.”
The first of those people was Murray Barr, and Johns and O’Bryan realized that if you totaled up all his hospital bills for the ten years that he had been on the streets—as well as substance-abuse-treatment costs, doctors’ fees, and other expenses—Murray Barr probably ran up a medical bill as large as anyone in the state of Nevada.
“It cost us one million dollars not to do something aboutMurray,” O’Bryan said.
At a time when hunger and homelessness are higher than they’ve been in decades; when the number of people living in poverty or perilously close to the poverty line stands at 1 in 6 Americans; as employment creation continues to lag and our leaders are calling for more and more budget cuts, and the gap between rich and poor is higher than ever…we cannot afford to spend millions of dollars to not do something about the very real problems that face people across our country. The old ways of doing business are just not working.
Soup kitchens and shelters started as emergency responses to terrible problems—to help ensure that people do not go hungry or die on the streets. No one, certainly their founders, ever considered these services as appropriate, permanent solutions to the problems. But soup kitchens and food pantries are now our standard response to hunger; cities see shelters as affordable housing for the homeless. When we see a story in the paper about a destitute woman and her children, we respond generously with food and clothes. When we see a guy panhandling on the street we flip him a buck. In her book Sweet Charity, sociologist Janet Poppendieck writes that charity acts as “a sort of moral safety valve; it reduces the discomfort evoked by visible destitution in our midst by creating the illusion of effective action and offering us myriad ways of participating in it. It creates a culture of charity that normalizes destitution and legitimates personal generosity as a response to injustice”.
We must shift our thinking and actions from a response of charity and service to one of justice. We need to reframe the old ways of doing the business of charity so that it is as they say, not just a hand out, but a hand up… We can do service, but we must also work for solutions.
- We can do canned food drives…but NJ ranks among the 10 worst states in government nutrition program participation. This means millions of dollars of federal funds are left inWashingtonbecause people eligible for things like food stamps and school breakfast program are not participating. We can do something about this by working with our local school boards and county boards of social services to enroll people in these vital safety net programs.
- We not only need to shelter, but to build and secure more affordable permanent housing; It can cost us anywhere from $10-30K per person each year to keep the homeless in shelters and hotels, or between $5-10K to put them into their own place. This requires that communities in NJ accept their fair share of affordable housing.
- While we care for the poor, we must also devote the time and energy to advocate for policies that will lift people out of poverty, we need to not only vote at the polls, but with our wallets by where we shop and where we invest our resources…we need to fight for the things that will lift people out of poverty, like higher minimum wage, EITC, affordable health care, affordable quality education. It troubles me when I see more people show up to fight charter schools in suburban NJ than show up inTrentonto support anti-poverty efforts.
This day has come to be synonymous with service. But it can also be a day of national action. A time for us to not only serve, but solve; a time to confront the social and economic forces that have institutionalized racism, poverty and other inequities in this country. Within a society, where the rich get richer and the poor and middle class are increasingly left behind, where people of color are disproportionately affected by poverty and other social ills, we need to join together in the struggle for a just and equitable society, where all have access to affordable health care, decent housing, a living wage and educational opportunities. It’s to this cause that Dr. Martin Luther King dedicated his life and work. For this he died. We honor him by remembering and carrying on his legacy, not only one day each year, but everyday. While this is a day about Dr. King, it is also a day about us. How will we live our lives, and how will we further the cause of justice for all?
These remarks were presented at the Martin Luther King Day event at the Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital on January 16, 2012 by Lisanne Finston